Comments

Your Comments

22 thoughts on “Comments

  1. Congratulations Jan27.org committee members for setting up this website!

    Lots of valuable information and links, especially for those looking into revisionism for the first time. I’ll be spreading the word on the websites that I frequent.

    Thank you for all your efforts!

  2. great site with excellent information. Thanks to all of those who put this together and a special thanks goes out to Carolyn.

  3. 1916: President Woodrow Wilson declared January 27 Jewish Relief Day, not really new.

    Search youtube for: Auschwitz prozess krakau. It’s in German only, about the first Auschwitz trial on Krakau/Poland. Reporting 300.000 victims.

    • A. The first Polish Auschwitz trial was Hoess’ in Warsaw, earlier in 1947.

      B. 300,000 *registered* victims; for whose deaths the camps guards (it was known as the Guard’s trial) were held responsible. The Indictment states that a minimum of 3,000,000 were killed at Auschwitz, but these guards were not held accountable for the victims allegedly gassed.

  4. Please consider adding Francis Parker Yockey to your list of deceased revisionists who were persecuted. He first caught trouble for insisting on pointing out the torture and forced confessions of Nuremburg. The harassment throughout his life eventually lead to his ‘suicide’ while imprisoned under FBI watch in which he somehow managed to get cyanide.

    Good work on the site, I like it.

    • We don’t consider Francis Parker Yockey a holocaust revisionist. Heck, we don’t even consider David Irving, the historian, a holocaust revisionist.

  5. Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.

    • This comment from “Fuck You” is from a computer located in HaMerkaz, Israel, which I believe is in the West Bank illegal settlements area. Just thought we’d let readers see the best argument mustered so far against the accurate, reliable content presented on this site. 100 times.

  6. Would it be possible to add another couple of days to honor the $35 Million Bucks for the Six Million Jews circa 1920 and also the billions of Jews exterminated by the Romans?

  7. GREAT IDEA AND RESOURCE . . .I love the website!

    “One of the saddest lessons of history IS THIS:
    If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject
    any evidence of the bamboozle.
    We’re no longer interested in finding out THE TRUTH.
    The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge –
    even to ourselves – that we’ve been SO credulous.”

    -Carl Edward Sagan, (1934-1996) Jewish American astronomer

    In a November 22, 1944 letter to U.S. State Department officials about their visits the Red Cross said: “We had NOT be able to discover ANY TRACE of installations for exterminating civilians prisoners. This corroborates a report which we had already received from other sources. . .”
    USA Today, Friday, May 2, 1997 page, 14A

    • To Laydee Liberty and others whose comments may have been edited or not posted:

      This site is only about Auschwitz-Birkenau, not about the huge topic of “Holocaust” in general. This is purposeful and will be adhered to – the reason being to focus (force?) visitor’s attention on the truth or falsehood of the best-known single part of the Holocaust story: Auschwitz. If this part of the story is false, or questionable, then so is it all.

      Another reason is to not lose sight that January 27 marks the so-called liberation of Auschwitz-Birkenau, and that is the date used for the major International remembrance events. We don’t want the Industry to shift away from the liberation of A-B to the liberation of all camps on this date. The alleged “Holocaust” took place in specific ways, at specific locations and at specific times, not as one big event as is suggested by the false and misleading term, Holocaust.

  8. My sincere thanks for your informative site! I hope that your side is not sacrificed censorship. We in Germany are not free to talk about the topic of “Auschwitz”, which is why we look in foreign countries for suitable sources.

    Nevertheless, we try to do justice to the truth in which we explain by “law-abiding knowledge” as the opposite strategy of the “gas chamber temperature”: http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Gas_chamber_temperature

    Good luck for the truth and free speech…
    (sorry for my rusted english)

  9. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point.
    You obviously know what youre talking about, why waste
    your intelligence on just posting videos to your blog when you could be
    giving us something enlightening to read?

    • To addent – Who are you talking to? You need to name the page, or article, or video you’re referring to; otherwise, your words are meaningless.

  10. Re Vincent Reynouard’s bilingual video: The “Gas-Chambers” at the Nuremberg Tribunal:

    As a matter of principle one should always check astounding allegations.

    So herewith the references:

    The confirmation that the former Commandant of Auschwitz concentration camp, Rudolf Hoess, was tortured and beaten almost to the point of death by his British Army captors, in order to extract from him the admission of multi-million mass-murder, which was then presented at the victorious Allies’ Nuremberg Tribunal as “proof of the Holocaust” can be read in the book, “Legions of Death”, written by Rupert Butler, and published by Hamlyn Books, London, U.K., 1983; pages 234 to 238.

    In any proper court of law, confessions obtained under torture have no probative value.

    The German policeman, Gestapo agent, Dr. Wilhelm Hoettl, was the prime Prosecution witness at the Allies’ Nuremberg Tribunal and as such is the source of the allegation that the Germans murdered Six Million Jews during the course of the Second World War. Hoettl’s claim was accepted at the Allies’ Nuremberg trial on face value, and without any further attempt undertaken of an independent, objective, forensic examination of the charge, that the the Germans had committed a crime of such mass-murder.

    At a later date, after the hysteria of the war-years had abated somewhat, the U.S. officials responsible for handling their witness-agent, Wilhelm Hoettl, had time to reflect on the character of their prime prosecution witness. Let us be clear here: had Hoettl not played the role allotted to him at Nuremberg, then without doubt he would have suffered the same fate as many of his erstwhile colleagues: the hangman’s noose.

    Many years later, the reports of U.S. Intelligence agents relating to these events were made public. Herewith their confidential opinion of the said Dr. Wilhelm Hoettl:

    “Upon his arrest in May 1945, Hoettl played to the interests of his captors…”

    “Dr. Wilhelm Hoettl is a fabricator of intelligence information. His reports normally consist of a fine cobweb of fact, heavily padded with lies, conjecture and other false information.”

    “a man of such low character and poor political record that his use for intelligence activities, regardless of how profitable they may be, is a short-sighted policy by the U.S.”

    The prime Prosecution witness and source of the Six Million allegation revealed, at last, as such a “low character, dealing in lies, deceit conjecture and other false types of information”, that his use by the U.S., regardless of “how profitable it may be, is a short-sighted policy.”

    Of the Truth revealed, one can only say: Better late then never.

    For the revelations of Hoettl’s true character, see the Journal of Historical Review, of September-December 2001, Vol 20, no.5-6, pages 25-32.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *