Your Comments

38 Comments

  1. DON’T FORGET THEM! Send a card of support to a currently jailed or prosecuted revisionist.

    Wolfgang FRÖHLICH (prisoner) – JVA Stein – Steiner Landstr 4 – A-3504 Kreims-Stein / Wachau – NO – AUSTRIA

    Axel Möller (prisoner) – JVA Bützow – Kühlungsborner Str. 29a – D-18246 Bützow, GERMANY

    Vincent Reynouard (recently convicted in France) – 12 Olyffe Av. Welling, Kent, DA 16 3HZ, ENGLAND

    Siegfried Verbeke (previously jailed activist) – Italiëlei 203b B-2000 Antwerp, BELGIUM

    Sylvia Stolz (awaiting sentencing) – Pfarrer-Grabmeier-Allee 10, D-85560 Ebersberg, GERMANY

    Dr. Ursula Haverbeck (awaiting sentencing ) – Bretthorststr. 199, D-32602, Vlotho-Valdorf, GERMANY

    Prof. Prof. R. Faurisson (currently being prosecuted in France) 10, Rue de Normandie F-03200, Vichy, FRANCE

    Arnold Höfs, Dipl.-Kfm ( 80 year old prisoner). Schulenburger Landstr. 145 (JVA/Haus 8) 30165 Hannover, GERMANY

    Horst Mahler (released from prison on medical leave): Weidenbusch 13 , 14532 Kleinmachnow/Brandenburg, GERMANY

    Benjamin Berger (young activist) Limburger Straße 122, 65582 Diez GERMANY

    Pedro Varela (bookstore inventory confiscated 2016) Apartado de Correos 34010, E-08080 Barcelona, SPAIN
    PayPal: [email protected]

  2. I want to express my disappointment at the website owners who have re-posted, via copy&paste without asking permission, the entire copyrighted article “The Making of a Monster – How Jews Created the Mengele Legend.” The author of this article was paid by us and his article went up early on Jan. 25th. Immediately vultures rushed down to grab it for their own websites that are made up entirely of re-posted material taken from websites with original content. The two most guilty parties are:

    Praxis Mag

    National Socialist Reeducation

    Notice they are free Blogspot and WordPress sites – no investment by the owners. Really, I hope you will avoid those sites since they’re not run by honorable people. Who even knows what their real purpose is.

    The correct procedure is to post a short introduction, maybe a couple of paragraphs at most, and link to the original source for the rest … as the Beer Barrel forum member did: The visitor should not be able to read the entire article at the copier’s site.

    UPDATE 1-31-16: National Socialist Reeducation has removed the article from their site. Good for them – thank you! Others that I contacted about it have also. Only Praxis Mag has not yet responded. I think that there should be some education on this subject of parasitism on the Internet. It’s way too prevalent. I believe that some inexperienced people think they’re doing something good and that it’s an acceptable practice. It’s not.

    UPDATE 2-1-16: Now Praxis Mag has also changed their post to show only 2 paragraphs and the first image, linking to jan27 to read the rest. That is the way it should be done – the best way.

    They wrote telling me and I wrote back thanking them. Praxis Mag is one of the sites that is made up entirely of re-posted articles, in full, from various sites around the Internet, and they’re not going to change that. I seem to be one of the few, if not the ONLY one, who objects to that practice.

    Carolyn, for the Jan27 Committee

  3. Kudos to all who contributed in any way to this incredible and useful project. Special thanks to Carolyn who does everything in a top notch and professional way.

    • Irene Sendler is a real person (she’s been on TV, haha) but her story is highly dramatized, and liberally sprinkled with outright lies. She’s been made into a Jewish saint, like Elie Wiesel, so there’s no need for truth to come into the picture at all. She was married and divorced 3 times, for whatever that’s worth.

  4. How very exciting to have ones ideas untrammelled so effectively by just reading the contents of your website. Bravo to all you brave people

      • There is in fact survivors that testify against this monster is more convenient to pretend it didn’t happen. Was Hitler also a victim of lies? May be if was yourselves and your family being torture would you make this false statements. There is plenty of evidence that this really happen. One day you will be in front of God answering for you too are guilty for denying the truth.

  5. This wonderful site is a huge step forward in understanding what really happened in the camps.
    Might I suggest future additions that would help others come to grips with this alleged fraud.
    1. The biggest counterargument is “but the photos show…” Perhaps a tab should be added which shows the photos and provide a real (concise) analysis of what is depicted – including the crude photo shopping attempts and outright mislabeling (i.e. use of photo of burning bodies – those that were actually victims of Dresden bombing.
    2. The inclusion of a link (or pdf) to Int’l Red Cross three volume report on German internment camps, post war. In particular the highlighting of table outlining their estimates of camp deaths. (I have see this table around cyberspace, although nothing to prove its authenticity.
    3. Short list of questions that revisionist have about the camps, etc.
    4. Running list of debunked things (soap, lampshades) and list of recanting Nuremburg “witnesses” and fraudulent books, etc.

    Keep up the great work. The truth always rises to the top.

  6. Re Vincent Reynouard’s bilingual video: The “Gas-Chambers” at the Nuremberg Tribunal:

    As a matter of principle one should always check astounding allegations.

    So herewith the references:

    The confirmation that the former Commandant of Auschwitz concentration camp, Rudolf Hoess, was tortured and beaten almost to the point of death by his British Army captors, in order to extract from him the admission of multi-million mass-murder, which was then presented at the victorious Allies’ Nuremberg Tribunal as “proof of the Holocaust” can be read in the book, “Legions of Death”, written by Rupert Butler, and published by Hamlyn Books, London, U.K., 1983; pages 234 to 238.

    In any proper court of law, confessions obtained under torture have no probative value.

    The German policeman, Gestapo agent, Dr. Wilhelm Hoettl, was the prime Prosecution witness at the Allies’ Nuremberg Tribunal and as such is the source of the allegation that the Germans murdered Six Million Jews during the course of the Second World War. Hoettl’s claim was accepted at the Allies’ Nuremberg trial on face value, and without any further attempt undertaken of an independent, objective, forensic examination of the charge, that the the Germans had committed a crime of such mass-murder.

    At a later date, after the hysteria of the war-years had abated somewhat, the U.S. officials responsible for handling their witness-agent, Wilhelm Hoettl, had time to reflect on the character of their prime prosecution witness. Let us be clear here: had Hoettl not played the role allotted to him at Nuremberg, then without doubt he would have suffered the same fate as many of his erstwhile colleagues: the hangman’s noose.

    Many years later, the reports of U.S. Intelligence agents relating to these events were made public. Herewith their confidential opinion of the said Dr. Wilhelm Hoettl:

    “Upon his arrest in May 1945, Hoettl played to the interests of his captors…”

    “Dr. Wilhelm Hoettl is a fabricator of intelligence information. His reports normally consist of a fine cobweb of fact, heavily padded with lies, conjecture and other false information.”

    “a man of such low character and poor political record that his use for intelligence activities, regardless of how profitable they may be, is a short-sighted policy by the U.S.”

    The prime Prosecution witness and source of the Six Million allegation revealed, at last, as such a “low character, dealing in lies, deceit conjecture and other false types of information”, that his use by the U.S., regardless of “how profitable it may be, is a short-sighted policy.”

    Of the Truth revealed, one can only say: Better late then never.

    For the revelations of Hoettl’s true character, see the Journal of Historical Review, of September-December 2001, Vol 20, no.5-6, pages 25-32.

  7. My sincere thanks for your informative site! I hope that your side is not sacrificed censorship. We in Germany are not free to talk about the topic of “Auschwitz”, which is why we look in foreign countries for suitable sources.

    Nevertheless, we try to do justice to the truth in which we explain by “law-abiding knowledge” as the opposite strategy of the “gas chamber temperature”: http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Gas_chamber_temperature

    Good luck for the truth and free speech…
    (sorry for my rusted english)

  8. GREAT IDEA AND RESOURCE . . .I love the website!

    “One of the saddest lessons of history IS THIS:
    If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject
    any evidence of the bamboozle.
    We’re no longer interested in finding out THE TRUTH.
    The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge –
    even to ourselves – that we’ve been SO credulous.”

    -Carl Edward Sagan, (1934-1996) Jewish American astronomer

    In a November 22, 1944 letter to U.S. State Department officials about their visits the Red Cross said: “We had NOT be able to discover ANY TRACE of installations for exterminating civilians prisoners. This corroborates a report which we had already received from other sources. . .”
    USA Today, Friday, May 2, 1997 page, 14A

    • To Laydee Liberty and others whose comments may have been edited or not posted:

      This site is only about Auschwitz-Birkenau, not about the huge topic of “Holocaust” in general. This is purposeful and will be adhered to – the reason being to focus (force?) visitor’s attention on the truth or falsehood of the best-known single part of the Holocaust story: Auschwitz. If this part of the story is false, or questionable, then so is it all.

      Another reason is to not lose sight that January 27 marks the so-called liberation of Auschwitz-Birkenau, and that is the date used for the major International remembrance events. We don’t want the Industry to shift away from the liberation of A-B to the liberation of all camps on this date. The alleged “Holocaust” took place in specific ways, at specific locations and at specific times, not as one big event as is suggested by the false and misleading term, Holocaust.

  9. Would it be possible to add another couple of days to honor the $35 Million Bucks for the Six Million Jews circa 1920 and also the billions of Jews exterminated by the Romans?

  10. Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.
    Rot in hell, you cunts.

    • This comment from “Fuck You” is from a computer located in HaMerkaz, Israel, which I believe is in the West Bank illegal settlements area. Just thought we’d let readers see the best argument mustered so far against the accurate, reliable content presented on this site. 100 times.

      • I could have guessed as much given the demonstrated lack of maturity and civility. Oh, did I mention, the absence of any constructive (counter)argument.

        • Since truth does and has always stood on it’s own merits, isn’t “anti-Semite”, is color blind and has absolutely no emotion, “the Synagogue” and their toadies cannot proffer “…any constructive (counter)argument.”
          Many years ago my father used to tell me about the treachery of the Jewish bankers and the Bolsheviks’ defilement of Germany/Russia/Danzig and the bulk of Europe which was exacerbated by the Wall Street swine, Roosevelt et al. Therefore I’ve always been exposed to denigration by Jews and their mindless “Goim”. For voicing the truth of the matter.
          Thanks to this site for their courage!

    • It’s nice to see some are looking at the holohoax B.S. and seeing it for what it is. Now…. Shall we discuss the 60,000,000 Christians/Muslims slaughtered in Russia, the 7,000,000 Christians/Muslims in Ukraine, the 60,000 German farmers and their families tortured and mutilated to death in the Danzig corridor by the brave precursors to the IDF? Shouldn’t you be out defacing Christian/Muslim places of worship and spitting upon their holy men?

  11. Please consider adding Francis Parker Yockey to your list of deceased revisionists who were persecuted. He first caught trouble for insisting on pointing out the torture and forced confessions of Nuremburg. The harassment throughout his life eventually lead to his ‘suicide’ while imprisoned under FBI watch in which he somehow managed to get cyanide.

    Good work on the site, I like it.

    • We don’t consider Francis Parker Yockey a holocaust revisionist. Heck, we don’t even consider David Irving, the historian, a holocaust revisionist.

      • “Heck, we don’t even consider David Irving, the historian, a holocaust revisionist.”

        This kind of idiocy annoys the hell out of me (of course I’m easily annoyed). Irving is a fantastic historian, has done 10 times what you have done to combat the hoax, unless you’re A. Butz or R. Faurisson, has suffered 10 times what you have suffered for fighting the hoax, unless you’re J. Graf or E. Zundel, and has said, “more people died on the back seat of Senator Edward Kennedy’s motor car in Chappaquiddick than died in the gas chamber of Auschwitz”. If that’s not good enough for you then to hell with you. This kind of asinine petty back-stabbing bickering, jealousy, self-righteousness, exclusivity, whatever, is entirely out of place in the revisionist movement.

        • Allan Davis,

          It was Germar Rudolf who complained, in the courtroom that sent him to prison for 2.5 years (he didn’t get out early, either), that David Irving was not a holocaust revisionist and he should keep his opinions to himself. Irving is a WWII historian, not holocaust. The two are not exactly the same. GR said Irving has never read the important revisionist books, doesn’t have the basic knowledge he needs, so therefore should shut up about it. And the four revisionists you have mentioned by name share Rudolf’s opinion of Irving.

          Irving is quite arrogant about his supposed superior brilliance, but it doesn’t extend to holocaust revisionism.

      • Here is the reality – anyone who fights the hoax and USES THEIR OWN NAME deserves our utmost admiration and respect. The hoax relies on the cowardice of the great majority of us, who are afraid to even reveal who we are. So for a coward like you to criticize Irving, or Weber, or anyone else you don’t deem worthy, from your anonymous perch behind your keyboard, is shameful.

        • First, it should be recalled that David Irving in the late 1970s offered the challenge that he would pay, it was either $1000 or £1000, to anyone who could demonstrate that Hitler knew anything about Jews being gassed. He was a celebrity and that was a rather daring thing to do at the time, but since then his daring has peaked and gone into decline.

          I was present to hear a prominent revisionist opine (privately) in the mid-1990s, when Irving’s terrible book about Goebbels appeared, that Irving had gotten into Revisionism in 1988 expecting that rejection of the Holocaust would be the next big thing in historiography, and that he would be on the vanguard of it and receive kudos for being ahead of the curve again.

          But it did not work out the way he expected at all. Instead he lost his status as a highly regarded celebrity historian and much of the opulence in his lifestyle.

          When that happened, Irving tried to appease the Traditional Enemy to repair the damage. He wrote that terrible book about Goebbels that relies heavily on a typewritten “diary” from the Soviet archives that is well known to be fraudulent, and he tried to return to his position of the 1970s that the Holocaust occurred without Hitler’s knowledge, with the extra stipulation that it did not occur at Auschwitz. All of this, the prominent revisionist opined, was David Irving’s attempt to get back the lifestyle that he had lost.

          Of course it did not accomplish that.

          I have been to one of David Irving’s events, and he is interesting, and probably a much better source on the Second World War than Stephen Ambrose, but still not as principled and trustworthy as we should like him to be. Irving is no Faurisson.

          • Irving really makes every effort to dissociate himself from revisionism. When Professor Faurisson offered to testify for him in his suit against Deborah Lipstadt, Irving refused the offer because he did not want the nefarious association. He emphasizes his differences from the revisionists in his public appearances.

            Faurisson calls Irving a semi-revisionist.

            We can even say that Irving is an enemy of revisionism, insofar as he goes around pretending to demonstrate on very flimsy premises that some kind of Holocaust occurred in the Aktion Reinhardt camps.

  12. 1916: President Woodrow Wilson declared January 27 Jewish Relief Day, not really new.

    Search youtube for: Auschwitz prozess krakau. It’s in German only, about the first Auschwitz trial on Krakau/Poland. Reporting 300.000 victims.

    • A. The first Polish Auschwitz trial was Hoess’ in Warsaw, earlier in 1947.

      B. 300,000 *registered* victims; for whose deaths the camps guards (it was known as the Guard’s trial) were held responsible. The Indictment states that a minimum of 3,000,000 were killed at Auschwitz, but these guards were not held accountable for the victims allegedly gassed.

  13. great site with excellent information. Thanks to all of those who put this together and a special thanks goes out to Carolyn.

  14. Congratulations Jan27.org committee members for setting up this website!

    Lots of valuable information and links, especially for those looking into revisionism for the first time. I’ll be spreading the word on the websites that I frequent.

    Thank you for all your efforts!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *